And now onto the post as originally written:
I took two days off Twitter and during my absence a huge scandal erupted over Amazon banning certain books from search results, rankings, and lists.
Why should anybody be surprised?
Given that action, why shouldn’t Amazon have been emboldened to act similarly?
We’ve all be hypnotized by convenience for the sake of our own good.
Everyone is in a selfish swoon over the immediate gratification the abominable Kindle offers.
That selfish pleasure comes at the cost of screwing publishers and turning direct-publishing writers into Amazon’s indentured servants.
When you give up your power and assist a monopoly, don’t cry later on that you’re being abused.
This is what it’s about: No one company should ever have enough power to deform the marketplace to its liking.
Not Apple, not Amazon, not Palm, not Microsoft, not Google, not Barnes & Noble, not Sony.
I’ve stood against the tide of Kindle worship because I could see what it would lead to: exactly the kind of behavior Amazon has revealed itself to be capable of committing.
This is why I’ve stood against everyone in favor of the Sony Reader. You might have to be inconvenienced right now to load books onto it via old-fashioned cable, but Sony is in this for the long run and sees its Reader as a universal eBook device.
That means when wireless of the Kindle kind is finally built into it, it will offer owners a freedom of buying choice that we have only seen a sneak preview of with Stanza Reader on the iPhone.
Each publisher, each author, can sell directly to readers without surrendering power to a colossal intermediary such as the Apple App Store, Amazon’s Kindle Store, or even Sony’s own eBook Store.
Freedom of choice in the eBook marketplace should be the vision in the forefront of every reader’s mind.
Screw having your eBook right now.
When you go for that, you’re giving up the power to have all possible choices later on.